21/06/2024

AsiaNationNews.com

Honesty – integrity – Trust

Picture : Kuasa Hukum PT Imza Rizky Jaya (IRJ) Dr. Drs. Sayid Fadhil,S.H.

PT IRJ Legal Advisor: The PKPU process is only a provisional decision and not yet final

June 23rd, 2022

 

 

  Translated by: PO

From:  Editorial strategisnews.co

 

PT IRJ Legal Advisor: The PKPU process is only a provisional decision and not yet final

 

Picture : Legal Advisor Of PT Imza Rizky Jaya (IRJ) Dr. Drs. Sayid Fadhil,S.H.

Jakarta (ANN) – PT Imza Rizky Jaya’s attorney (Lawyer) (IRJ) Dr. Drs. Sayid Fadhil, S.H. M.Hum, regrets the statement from PT Spectratama Perkasa’s attorney, Affandi, regarding the Indonesia Terang program.
In a statement received by the editor of strategisnews.co, Sayid Fadhil said that the Indonesia Terang program, is a purely private program, implemented by PT Imza Rizky Jaya (IRJ) for the provision of solar power in various regions, not a program from the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources.

“We regret the news in one of the online media that the Indonesia Terang program is a program from the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. We make it clear, the program is a pure private sector implemented by PT Imza Rizky Jaya,” said Sayid Fadhil.

“Mrs. Rizayati, as one of President Jokowi’s successful teams at that time, responded to what Mr. President said for the provision and distribution of solar electricity, especially in areas that did not receive electricity. So once again, we will clarify that the Indonesia Terang program is a purely private program, as a form of Ms. Rizayati’s moral commitment to the provision of solar electricity,” he said.

Regarding the case that is currently in court, between the applicant, namely PT Spectratama Perkasa and the respondent PT Imza Rizky Jaya, Sayid Fadhil said that the PKPU process was ongoing, and only a provisional decision, not yet final.
“The PKPU process is ongoing and yesterday it was only a provisional decision and not yet final. Now we are looking for the best solution between the applicant, in this case PT Spectratama Perkasa and the respondent PT Imza Rizky Jaya,” he explained.

“We regret the statement of the legal counsel for the applicant PT Spectratama Perkasa, which did not touch the substance. Currently the applicant and the respondent are looking for the best solution. We need to emphasize here, that PT Imza Rizky Jaya does not mean that it has not resolved the debt payment obligation dispute, we have made payments but have not finished. For that, we are working on a mediation process and looking for a good solution,” he said.
Previously, after going through a long process and several trials, finally on Tuesday, March 22 2022, the PKPU Trial Decision at the Commercial Court, Central Jakarta District Court which was read by the Chairman of the Panel of Judges led by presiding judge Yusuf Pranowo, S.H.M.H rejected PT. Mediatama Cipta Citra’s lawsuit. and PT. Spectratama Perkasa against the respondent PT. Imza Rizky Jaya

In this PKPU case, Sayid explained that his party continues to collect supporting documents as evidence to refute the evidence submitted by the applicant which does not have convincing legal force.
The Panel of Judges of the Central Jakarta District Court decided to reject the lawsuit of PT. Mediatama Cipta Citra to PT. IRJ Group in the trial reading the verdict.
“Declaring that the PKPU Respondent, namely PT. Imza Rizky Jaya Group, having its address at The Plaza Office Tower Plaza Indonesia, 25th floor, Jl. MH. Thamrin Kavling 28-30, Central Jakarta, is in a state of Temporary Debt Payment Obligation (PKPU) with all the legal consequences,” read the Jakarta District Court Judges

Then appointed Judges of the Commercial Court and Central Jakarta District Court as Supervisory Judges to oversee the process of Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. (editorial)

Source of strategisnews.co

About Post Author